diso

DISO Member Ontology Citations

Preferred citation for each member ontology in the DISO collection, one row per ontology. Generated from the metadata network (metadata/diso-network.ttl, property dcterms:bibliographicCitation); regenerate with scripts/build-citations.py. Citations are bibliographic references only — no copyrighted abstracts are reproduced. For the ontologies retained under author correspondence (BOnSAI, IRIS, CoDAMoS, SO, SmartEnv) the preferred citation is the one supplied by the authors.

# Ontology Cluster Preferred citation DOI
1 OWL-S agentic David Martin (ed.), Mark Burstein, Jerry Hobbs, Ora Lassila, Drew McDermott, Sheila McIlraith, Srini Narayanan, Massimo Paolucci, Bijan Parsia, Terry Payne, Evren Sirin, Naveen Srinivasan, Katia Sycara. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. W3C Member Submission, 22 November 2004. https://www.w3.org/submissions/2004/SUBM-OWL-S-20041122/
2 CoDAMoS context-awareness Preuveneers, D., Van den Bergh, J., Wagelaar, D., Georges, A., Rigole, P., Clerckx, T., Berbers, Y., Coninx, K., Jonckers, V., De Bosschere, K. (2004). Towards an extensible context ontology for ambient intelligence. In European Symposium on Ambient Intelligence (EUSAI 2004), pp. 148–159. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30473-9_15 10.1007/978-3-540-30473-9_15
3 mIO! context-awareness Poveda-Villalón, M., Suárez-Figueroa, M. C., García-Castro, R., and Gómez-Pérez, A. (2010). A Context Ontology for Mobile Environments. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies (CIAO 2010), co-located with EKAW 2010, Lisbon, Portugal. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 626. ISSN 1613-0073. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-626/regular3.pdf
4 ATTACK cyber-security Kabul Kurniawan, Andreas Ekelhart, Elmar Kiesling. “An ATT&CK-KG for Linking Cybersecurity Attacks to Adversary Tactics and Techniques.” In ISWC 2021 Posters, Demos, and Industry Tracks, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2980, paper363. CEUR-WS.org, 2021. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2980/paper363.pdf
5 CAPEC cyber-security Kurniawan, K., Kiesling, E., Winkler, D., and Ekelhart, A. (2024). The ICS-SEC KG: An Integrated Cybersecurity Resource for Industrial Control Systems. In: The Semantic Web – ISWC 2024, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 15233, pp. 153–170. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77847-6_9 10.1007/978-3-031-77847-6_9
6 CPE cyber-security Kiesling, E., Ekelhart, A., Kurniawan, K., and Ekaputra, F. (2019). The SEPSES Knowledge Graph: An Integrated Resource for Cybersecurity. In C. Ghidini et al. (Eds.), The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11779, pp. 198–214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13 10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13
7 CVE cyber-security Kiesling, E., Ekelhart, A., Kurniawan, K., & Ekaputra, F. (2019). The SEPSES Knowledge Graph: An Integrated Resource for Cybersecurity. In The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 11779, pp. 198–214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13 10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13
8 CVSS cyber-security Kiesling, E., Ekelhart, A., Kurniawan, K., & Ekaputra, F. (2019). The SEPSES Knowledge Graph: An Integrated Resource for Cybersecurity. In C. Ghidini et al. (Eds.), The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11779, pp. 198–214). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13 10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13
9 CWE cyber-security Kiesling, E., Ekelhart, A., Kurniawan, K., and Ekaputra, F. (2019). The SEPSES Knowledge Graph: An Integrated Resource for Cybersecurity. In: The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11779, pp. 198–214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13 10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13
10 D3FEND cyber-security Kaloroumakis, P. E. and Smith, M. J. (2021). Toward a Knowledge Graph of Cybersecurity Countermeasures. Technical Report Case 20-2034. The MITRE Corporation, Annapolis Junction, MD. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Available: https://d3fend.mitre.org/resources/D3FEND.pdf (also indexed at DTIC accession AD1156977).
11 ICSA cyber-security Kurniawan, K., Kiesling, E., Winkler, D., and Ekelhart, A. (2024). The ICS-SEC KG: An Integrated Cybersecurity Resource for Industrial Control Systems. In: The Semantic Web – ISWC 2024, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 15233, pp. 153–170. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77847-6_9 10.1007/978-3-031-77847-6_9
12 ICS-SEC-KG-ONTO cyber-security Kabul Kurniawan, Elmar Kiesling, Dietmar Winkler, Andreas Ekelhart. “The ICS-SEC KG: An Integrated Cybersecurity Resource for Industrial Control Systems.” In: The Semantic Web – ISWC 2024, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 15233, pp. 153–170. Springer, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77847-6_9 10.1007/978-3-031-77847-6_9
13 ITIO cyber-security Costa, D., Albrethsen, M. J., Collins, M. L., Perl, S., Silowash, G., & Spooner, D. (2016). An Insider Threat Indicator Ontology. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2016-TR-007. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.
14 Ops cyber-security Ops (Operations) Ontology — a community OWL ontology for interoperability between the software-development and operations domains; the upstream project bundles a MITRE ATT&CK module that is not present in the DISO-merged artefact. Source: github.com/CDSRV/ops-ontology. No associated peer-reviewed publication was identified.
15 SNORT cyber-security Kiesling, E., Ekelhart, A., Kurniawan, K., and Ekaputra, F. (2019). The SEPSES Knowledge Graph: An Integrated Resource for Cybersecurity. In: The Semantic Web – ISWC 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11779, pp. 198–214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13 10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_13
16 STIX cyber-security OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence Technical Committee. STIX Version 2.1. Edited by Bret Jordan, Rich Piazza, and Trey Darley. OASIS Standard. 10 June 2021. https://docs.oasis-open.org/cti/stix/v2.1/os/stix-v2.1-os.html. (OWL binding: OASIS Threat Actor Context TC, tac-ontology, https://github.com/oasis-tcs/tac-ontology)
17 UCO_1 cyber-security Casey, E., Barnum, S., Griffith, R., Snyder, J., van Beek, H., and Nelson, A. (2018). The Evolution of Expressing and Exchanging Cyber-investigation Information in a Standardized Form. In: Biasiotti et al. (eds), Handling and Exchanging Electronic Evidence Across Europe. Springer. [Foundational CASE/UCO reference; UCO is a community project, github.com/ucoProject/UCO.]
18 UCO_2 cyber-security Zareen Syed, Ankur Padia, Tim Finin, Lisa Mathews, and Anupam Joshi. UCO: A Unified Cybersecurity Ontology. AAAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security (AICS), February 2016.
19 SAREF digital-twins Daniele, L., den Hartog, F., and Roes, J. (2015). Created in Close Interaction with the Industry: The Smart Appliances REFerence (SAREF) Ontology. In: Cuel, R., Young, R. (eds) Formal Ontologies Meet Industry. FOMI 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 225. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21545-7_9 10.1007/978-3-319-21545-7_9
20 IES information-exchange Ian Bailey, John Beverley, Helena Blackmore, Andreas Cola, Paul Cripps, Giacomo de Colle, Federico Donato, Amanda Hicks, David Limbaugh, Elena Milivinti, Chris Partridge, Rebecca Rafferty, Barry Smith. “Comparing Information Exchange Standard and Basic Formal Ontology Design Patterns.” In: The Joint Ontology Workshops (JOWO) — Episode XI, co-located with FOIS 2025, Catania, Italy, 8–12 September 2025. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 4176.
21 JC3IEDM information-exchange Matheus, C.J. & Ulicny, B. (2007). On the Automatic Generation of an OWL Ontology based on the Joint C3 Information Exchange Data Model. In Proceedings of the 12th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (ICCRTS), Newport, RI, USA.
22 CordaSecOnt information-security Mubashar Iqbal and Raimundas Matulevičius, “Corda Security Ontology: Example of Post-Trade Matching and Confirmation”, Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 638–674, 2020. DOI: 10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.4.11 10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.4.11
23 MDISOnt information-security Meriah, I., Ben Arfa Rabai, L., & Khedri, R. (2025). Building a comprehensive and multi-dimensional information security ontology: elicitation process and OWL implementation. Knowledge and Information Systems, 67(1), 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02308-y 10.1007/s10115-024-02308-y
24 OntoSecRPA information-security Anastasiya Kurylets and Nikolaj Goranin, “Security Ontology OntoSecRPA for Robotic Process Automation Domain,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 9, art. 5568, 2023. DOI: 10.3390/app13095568 10.3390/app13095568
25 SecAOnto information-security de Franco Rosa, F., Teixeira Junior, L.A.L., Bonacin, R., and Jino, M. (2020). SecAOnto: A Conceptual Model of Security Assessment. International Journal of Web Portals, 12(2), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWP.2020070104 10.4018/IJWP.2020070104
26 SO information-security Herzog, A., Shahmehri, N., and Duma, C. (2007). An Ontology of Information Security. International Journal of Information Security and Privacy (IJISP) 1(4): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/jisp.2007100101 10.4018/jisp.2007100101
27 CCO mid-level Mark Jensen, Giacomo De Colle, Sean Kindya, Cameron More, Alexander P. Cox, and John Beverley. “The Common Core Ontologies.” In Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference (FOIS 2024), Volume 394, pp. 47–58. IOS Press, 2024. DOI: 10.3233/FAIA241292 10.3233/FAIA241292
28 IRIS risk-management Georgios Meditskos, Nick Bassiliades, Dimitris Vrakas, and Ioannis Vlahavas. 2012. IRISPortal: a semantic portal for industrial risk cases management. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS ‘12), Article 28, 1–8. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2254129.2254164 10.1145/2254129.2254164
29 CORA robotics Prestes, E., Carbonera, J. L., Fiorini, S. R., Jorge, V. A. M., Abel, M., Madhavan, R., Locoro, A., Gonçalves, P. J. S., Barreto, M. E., Habib, M. K., Chibani, A., Gérard, S., Amirat, Y., and Schlenoff, C. I. (2013). Towards a core ontology for robotics and automation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61(11), 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2013.04.005 10.1016/j.robot.2013.04.005
30 SAWCore situation-awareness Matheus, C. J., Kokar, M. M., & Baclawski, K. (2003). A core ontology for situation awareness. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION 2003), pp. 545–552.
31 SOUPA situation-awareness Harry Chen, Filip Perich, Tim Finin, Anupam Joshi. “SOUPA: Standard Ontology for Ubiquitous and Pervasive Applications.” Proceedings of the First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services (MobiQuitous 2004), IEEE, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/MOBIQ.2004.1331732 10.1109/MOBIQ.2004.1331732
32 STO situation-awareness Kokar, M. M., Matheus, C. J., and Baclawski, K. (2009). Ontology-based situation awareness. Information Fusion, 10(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2007.01.004 10.1016/j.inffus.2007.01.004
33 BOnSAI smart-buildings Thanos G. Stavropoulos, Dimitris Vrakas, Danai Vlachava, and Nick Bassiliades. 2012. BOnSAI: a smart building ontology for ambient intelligence. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS ‘12), Article 30, 1–12. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2254129.2254166 10.1145/2254129.2254166
34 BOT smart-buildings Rasmussen, M. H., Lefrançois, M., Schneider, G. F., & Pauwels, P. (2021). BOT: the Building Topology Ontology of the W3C Linked Building Data Group. Semantic Web, 12(1), 143–161. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-200385 10.3233/SW-200385
35 BRICK smart-buildings Balaji, B., Bhattacharya, A., Fierro, G., Gao, J., Gluck, J., Hong, D., Johansen, A., Koh, J., Ploennigs, J., Agarwal, Y., Bergés, M., Culler, D., Gupta, R. K., Kjærgaard, M. B., Srivastava, M., and Whitehouse, K. (2018). Brick: Metadata schema for portable smart building applications. Applied Energy, 226, 1273–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.091 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.091
36 IMF smart-buildings Information Modelling Framework (IMF) — an industry ontology/framework for facility asset modelling. Source: ns.imfid.org / github.com/imf-lab (IMF Manual). No associated peer-reviewed publication was identified.
37 CityOWL smart-cities Vinasco-Alvarez, D., Samuel, J., Servigne, S., and Gesquiere, G. (2024). Towards an Automated Transformation of an nD Urban Data Model to a Computational Ontology Network: From UML to OWL, From CityGML 3.0 to CityOWL. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, X-4/W4-2024, pp. 231-238. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W4-2024-231-2024 10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W4-2024-231-2024
38 SMOF smart-cities He, X.; Kuai, X.; Li, X.; Qiu, Z.; He, B.; Guo, R. Smart City Ontology Framework for Urban Data Integration and Application. Smart Cities 2025, 8(5), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8050165 10.3390/smartcities8050165
39 SmartEnv smart-homes Alirezaie, M., Hammar, K., Blomqvist, E., Nyström, M., and Ivanova, V. (2018). SmartEnv Ontology in E-care@home. In SSN 2018 — 9th Int. Semantic Sensor Networks Workshop (ISWC 2018), vol. 2213, pp. 72–79.
40 ThinkHome smart-homes Christian Reinisch, Mario J. Kofler, Félix Iglesias, Wolfgang Kastner. “ThinkHome Energy Efficiency in Future Smart Homes.” EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, vol. 2011, Article ID 104617, 18 pp., 2011. DOI: 10.1155/2011/104617. 10.1155/2011/104617
41 BFO upper-level Otte, J.N., Beverley, J., and Ruttenberg, A. (2022). BFO: Basic Formal Ontology. Applied Ontology, 17(1), 17–43. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-220262 10.3233/AO-220262
42 DOLCE upper-level Borgo, S., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Porello, D., Sanfilippo, E. M., & Vieu, L. (2022). DOLCE: A descriptive ontology for linguistic and cognitive engineering. Applied Ontology, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-210259 10.3233/AO-210259
43 DUL upper-level Presutti, V. & Gangemi, A. (2016). Dolce+D&S Ultralite and its main ontology design patterns. In Ontology Engineering with Ontology Design Patterns: Foundations and Applications (Studies on the Semantic Web, vol. 25, pp. 81–103). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-676-7-81 10.3233/978-1-61499-676-7-81
44 GFO upper-level Loebe, F., Burek, P., & Herre, H. (2022). GFO: The General Formal Ontology. Applied Ontology, 17(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-220264 10.3233/AO-220264
45 GFO-Bio upper-level Hoehndorf, R., Loebe, F., Poli, R., Herre, H., & Kelso, J. (2008). GFO-Bio: A biological core ontology. Applied Ontology, 3(4), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-2008-0055 10.3233/AO-2008-0055
46 gUFO upper-level João Paulo A. Almeida, Giancarlo Guizzardi, Tiago Prince Sales, Ricardo A. Falbo. “gUFO: A Lightweight Implementation of the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO)”. Version 1.0.0, 2019. Available: http://purl.org/nemo/doc/gufo. (A 2026 arXiv preprint expanding this work: Almeida et al., “gUFO: A Gentle Foundational Ontology for Semantic Web Knowledge Graphs”, arXiv:2603.20948, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.20948) 10.48550/arXiv.2603.20948
47 SUMO upper-level Ian Niles and Adam Pease. ‘Towards a Standard Upper Ontology.’ In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2001), Ogunquit, Maine, USA, October 17–19, 2001. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/505168.505170. 10.1145/505168.505170